Bioelectronic Medicine is a member journal of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and follows their recommendations for authorship. All four of the following criteria must be met for authorship:
The European Association of Science Editors (EASE) has published multilingual guidelines for non-native English authors and translators. These guidelines are aimed at making scientific communication more efficient worldwide and preventing scientific misconduct. To view the multilingual guidelines please see this website: http://www.ease.org.uk/guidelines/index.shtml
At this time, authors will not be charged article processing fees to submit or publish a manuscript. If the work is accepted, there will be no charges for color pages, excess pages or word count.
Author Acknowledgement and Disclosure
Upon acceptance, all authors are required to complete an Open Access Authorization form as well as a Conflict of Interest - Disclosure form. These must be submitted electronically. All forms from all authors must be completed and submitted prior to the release of a final typeset-author approved galley.
After acceptance, the manuscript is published online at www.bioelecmed.org as an uncorrected proof (generally within one week of acceptance). Should an author wish to embargo their own work they must notify the editorial office immediately upon notification of manuscript acceptance at: email@example.com. The production staff then copyedits and typesets the manuscript. This ensures the work conforms to Bioelectronic Medicine’s house style and figures and tables are of publication quality, clarity and size. Authors will then receive a proof, which may include queries to be addressed. The corresponding author is responsible for completing this work with the production staff. The corresponding author is responsible for the accuracy of content, spelling of names and affiliations of all co-authors.
After acceptance, the manuscript is published online at www.bioelecmed.org as an uncorrected proof (generally within one week of acceptance). Once the final galley is author approved it is placed into the queue for final posting. If all authors have signed both the Open Access Authorization form and Conflict of Interest-Disclosure form, the final author-approved PDF paper will replace the uncorrected proofs on the journal’s website. Submission to Crossref, PubMed, PubMed Central and other indices will be sought in accordance with their requirements.
Bioelectronic Medicine's Editors, not its reviewers, judge which submissions will appeal to our broad audience. Reviewers contribute constructive reports and comments, and suggest preliminary decisions. Publication is informed by prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings, as well as general appeal of the work to a broad audience.
Once submitted, a manuscript will be reviewed by the Editors who consider whether to send the work for peer-review. The manuscript deemed suitable for the journal will be assigned to an Associate or Contributing Editor who has agreed to undertake its rapid review, soliciting the opinions of independent reviewers. While authors are required to submit three potential reviewers, Editors are free to decide whom to invite for a review. Editors generally honor requests that a manuscript not be sent to competing groups for review. Most manuscripts receive two or three reviews, however, some receive more, and occasionally some receive just one.
Reviewers are generally chosen based on their independence from the authors, ability to evaluate technical aspects of the paper fairly, availability to return a review within the required timeframe, and quality of previous reviews (if applicable). Reviewers are asked to submit a Conflict of Interest – Disclosure statement at the time of their review. If upon selection the reviewer identifies a conflict of interest, the reviewer should contact the editorial office immediately firstname.lastname@example.org. Reviewers are required to keep all material related to the manuscript strictly confidential.
Reviewers generally report on: whether the manuscript promotes the understanding of disease pathogenesis of neural circuits at the anatomical, functional or molecular signaling level; whether the work includes a tool that could be used in disease diagnosis, treatment or prevention; what audience the work will appeal to and why; and any technical issues that may need to be addressed. Reviewers then make a recommendation on whether to accept, defer a decision, or reject the work.
Once a manuscript has undergone a round of review the Editorial Board will generally assess the referee reports, the manuscript itself, and any other related materials in preparation for adjudication. Authors will receive one of the following decisions:
Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions. The appeals process is time intensive and Bioelectronic Medicine's Editors may be delayed in responding while reviewing individual cases. Manuscripts must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. Appeals must be made in writing (email@example.com) and should be restricted to the scientific case for publication. Once received, the scientific argument will be considered by members of the Editorial Board and/or the Scientific Advisory Committee. In some cases the work may be sent back to the original reviewers (for example, if new data is supplied in the appeal) or entered into a new external peer review process. Once adjudicated, the decision of the Editorial Board is final.
Bioelectronic Medicine generally does not participate in electronic advertising on it’s website.
While authors are required to submit three potential reviewers, Editors are free to decide whom to invite for a review. Editors generally honor requests that a manuscript not be sent to competing groups for review. Reviewers are asked to submit a Conflict of Interest – Disclosure statement at the time of their review. If upon selection the reviewer identifies a conflict of interest, the individual should contact the editorial office immediately firstname.lastname@example.org.
Clinical studies should include pertinent details about human subjects, including methods of recruitment and relevant physical characteristics. Reports of human studies must include a statement that the protocol was approved by the appropriate institutional committee (national or international) or that it complied with the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013 - http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
Research on animals should include a statement that the protocol was approved by the appropriate institutional committee and complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Additional policies may be found in the Terms of Service, Privacy, Community Guidelines, and Notice of Takedown.